Call us on – 0800 0443 730

Hull MC – R v JI

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (114 in blood). The issues in the case were the police had not supplied a container for independent analysis and the client was not medically fit to consent after sustaining injuries following a road traffic...

Loughborough MC – R v US

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (40 in breath). The issues in the case were the breath alcohol level was within the margin of error which raised questions about the reliability of the device and the officer failed to complete the MG DD/A...

Birmingham MC – R v HA

The client was charged with failing to provide a specimen of breath. The client had mental health issues and had no confidence in the officer conducting the breath test procedure due to a previous incident. The client was represented at the first hearing by Ritesh...

Cambridge MC – R v NG

The Defendant was prosecuted for driving whilst unfit through alcohol. The issues in the case were the breath alcohol level (38) was such that driving would not have been impaired and fitness to be detained. Richard Berman (Gold panel lawyer) instructed by Laura...

Bromley MC – R v ZC

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol. The issues in the case were borderline breath alcohol within the margin of error (46 in breath), failure to provide printout at the time of the breath test procedure and the clock on the device had not been...