Call us on – 0800 0443 730

Chelmsford MC – R v MP

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (50 in breath). The issues in the case were machine reliability as the client did not accept sufficient alcohol was consumed to exceed the prescribed limit. There were also mistakes in procedure including the...

Staines MC – R v SN

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol. The issues in the case were machine reliability and mental fitness to understand the statutory warning. The charges were dismissed after Eugene McLaughlin (Gold panel lawyer) instructed by Sandra Cooper...

Great Yarmouth MC – R v MW

The client was prosecuted for being drunk in charge. The issues in the case were no intention to drive and more than two breath samples were taken contrary to the statutory procedure. The client was represented by Sneha Shrestha (platinum level lawyer) at the first...

Nottingham MC – R v KO

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (120 in urine) and assault. The issues were fitness for interview, fitness for detention, continuity and reliability of the sample as the two urine specimens were taken less than 30 minutes apart. After...

Colchester MC – R v HB

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (41 in breath). The issues in the case included the reliability of the breath test device, failure to ask questions on the breath test booklet and private land as the car was located in a car parking space for...