Call us on – 0800 0443 730

Leeds MC – R v JM

The client was prosecuted for driving with cannabis above the specified limit (3.0 in blood) and driving with cocaine above the specified limit (116 in blood). The vial was not shaken for 30 seconds for the preservative to take effect and the client was not given a...

Police officers widely misusing body-worn cameras

The BBC have reported on comments made by National Police Chief Council’s lead for body-worn video, Acting Chief Constable Jim Colwell. Dispute failings undermine confidence in policing in his view and more footage should now be released in order to improve...

Peterborough MC – R v TA

The client was prosecuted for failing to provide specimen of breath. The officer failed to assess the client for the need for an Edo speaking translator. Jay Lemosa instructed by Laura Heywood (reviewing lawyer) successfully persuaded the court to dismiss the charges...

Peterborough MC – R v SB

The client was prosecuted for failing to provide specimen of breath. The issues were mental state and failure by police to arrange a social worker which was necessary due to the client’s vulnerable state. Jay Lemosa instructed by Micaila Williams (reviewing lawyer)...

Derby MC – R v SG

The client was prosecuted for failing to provide. The officer did not repeat the statutory warning as required by the MG DD/A specimen booklet and did not ask if there were medical reasons why the client could not provide the breath specimen. David Houldcroft...

Ipswich MC – R v GA

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (67 in breath). The issues in the case included failure by police to complete the MG DD/A booklet, unlawful use of handcuffs and evidence of driving. At the second hearing which was listed for trial James...

Reading MC – R v OT

The client was prosecuted for driving with cannabis above the specified limit (4.1 in blood). The client had a needle phobia and the blood was taken more than once contrary to the statutory procedure. James Brookes (Gold panel lawyer) instructed by Trevor Feehily...

Swansea MC – R v RG

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (95 in breath). The client did not accept consuming excess alcohol and handcuffs were used without justification. At the second hearing which was listed for trial Victoria Maud instructed by Micaila Williams...

Bromley MC – R v NP

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (85 in breath). The issues were insufficient alcohol was consumed to exceed the prescribed limit and the client was too distressed to understand the statutory warning. The client was represented at the first...

Willesden MC – R v KT

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (41 in breath). The issues were the reliability of the police station breath test device, the statutory warning was not given and the officer made false claims about the manner of driving to justify the vehicle...