Call us on – 0800 0443 730

Swansea MC – R v RG

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (95 in breath). The client did not accept consuming excess alcohol and handcuffs were used without justification. At the second hearing which was listed for trial Victoria Maud instructed by Micaila Williams...

Bromley MC – R v NP

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (85 in breath). The issues were insufficient alcohol was consumed to exceed the prescribed limit and the client was too distressed to understand the statutory warning. The client was represented at the first...

Willesden MC – R v KT

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (41 in breath). The issues were the reliability of the police station breath test device, the statutory warning was not given and the officer made false claims about the manner of driving to justify the vehicle...

R v BM – York MC

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (47 in breath). The issues in the case included the failure by police to arrange a Nepalese interpreter, fitness to be detained and special reasons due to the shortness of distance driven. At the second hearing...

Birmingham Crown Court – R v AW

The client appealed against a mandatory disqualification for failing to provide breath (29 months). The magistrates court had incorrectly applied the failing to provide (vehicle driver) sentencing guidelines instead of failing to provide (in charge). David Houldcroft...

Staines MC – R v DH

The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol (73 in breath). The issues in the case were the reliability of the breath test device and private land. At the second hearing which was listed for trial, Jay Lemosa instructed by Micaila Williams (reviewing...