The client was prosecuted for driving with excess alcohol. The issues in the case were mental fitness to understand the statutory warning as the client had ADHD and the officer failed to explain the warning clearly and there was a calibration error message on the machine before the device produced two breath samples which required the officer to move to blood or urine. After representation from Siddick Gokhool at the first hearing, Laura Heywood (reviewing lawyer) persuaded the prosecution to discontinue the charges before the second hearing after raising the failure by the police to produce a witness statement from the officer exhibiting the body cam footage.